Skip to content
WorkFree ToolsResourcesCompany
Free · No signup to see your result

AI Readiness Assessment

Most failed AI programmes were not defeated by the technology. They ran into unreachable data, undocumented processes and unclear ownership. This scores those first.

19 questions · about two minutes

1. Is the data an AI would need held in systems rather than in people or spreadsheets?
2. How much do you trust the accuracy of your core records?
3. Can you export or query historical records (tickets, orders, calls) for analysis?
4. Are the processes you would automate documented?
5. Would two people describe the process the same way?
6. Do you measure how long the process takes or how often it fails?
7. Do your core systems expose APIs?
8. Do you have staging or test environments?
9. Who can change your core systems?
10. Do you have role-based access control across your systems?
11. Do you have a position on where company data may be processed?
12. Are actions in your core systems audit-logged?
13. Is there a named owner accountable for the outcome?
14. How would your team react to automation of their work?
15. Is there a budget for ongoing running and tuning, not just the build?
16. What automation exists today?
17. Have you tried an AI tool in a business process before?
18. Do your systems already talk to each other?
19. Is there a single place where a customer's full history can be seen?

What does AI readiness actually mean?

AI readiness is not about having a strategy document or a budget. It means four practical things: the data an AI would need to make a decision exists somewhere reachable and is reasonably accurate; the processes it would automate are defined well enough that two people would describe them the same way; someone owns the outcome and can approve changes; and your security and access model can accommodate a system acting on your behalf. A business strong on those can deploy quickly. A business weak on them will spend most of its budget discovering that.

Methodology

How this is calculated

Published in full, so you can disagree with it. A tool that hides its model is a lead form.

  1. Nineteen questions across seven categories, each answer scored 0–1 for maturity.
  2. Data, systems and processes carry the highest weights because they determine whether a project is feasible at all; automation maturity carries the lowest because it is a nice-to-have, not a prerequisite.
  3. The overall score is the weighted average of category scores, not of individual answers, so one weak category is not hidden by a strong one.
  4. The priority list shows your weakest individual answers with a specific recommended action for each.

Assumptions and limits

  • Self-assessment. Teams consistently overestimate data quality and process documentation — if in doubt, choose the lower option.
  • A high score does not mean automation is worthwhile for you, only that you could deliver it. Use the Automation Opportunity Scanner for the value question.
  • Weightings reflect our delivery experience and are published so you can apply your own judgement.

FAQ

Questions about this tool

Often yes, if you narrow the scope. A single workflow against a single accessible system is a legitimate way to build readiness rather than wait for it. What does not work is starting broad while the foundations are weak.
Systems and data. Process and leadership problems slow a project down; data and system access problems can stop it entirely.
Work the priority list top-down. Most of it is process and access work rather than software purchase — getting decision-critical data into systems, documenting the process, and naming an owner.
No. Nothing is stored unless you choose to have the report emailed to you.

Turn the number into a plan.

Send us the workflow behind your result. We will come back with how we would automate it, what stays human, and what it takes to build.