Skip to content

Stratgik — technology strategy and business systems engineering.
Delivery across the USA, UK, UAE and India.

Talk about a problem

Monitoring & alerting

Knowing before the customer does

Most systems are monitored in the sense that a dashboard exists. Far fewer will wake somebody when the thing that matters to a customer stops working.

In short

Useful monitoring alerts on symptoms a customer would notice — checkout failing, orders not reaching the warehouse, response times degrading — rather than on individual resources. The test is whether every alert that fires requires action. Once a monitor produces alerts people routinely ignore, it has stopped being monitoring and become noise, and the real outages hide inside it.

When it applies

Signals this is the work

If more than one of these is true today, the problem is usually further along than it looks from the outside.

Users report problems first

Your earliest signal is a complaint.

Alerts are muted

A channel exists and nobody reads it, because most of what arrives is not actionable.

Only infrastructure is watched

CPU and disk are monitored. Whether an order can actually be placed is not.

Diagnosis means guessing

When something breaks, the first hour goes on working out where, because nothing correlates.

Nobody owns the alert

It fires into a group. Everyone assumes someone else has it.

How we do it

The sequence

  1. 01

    Define what "working" means

    In business terms: an order can be placed, a payment clears, data reaches the ERP. That is what gets monitored.

  2. 02

    Alert on symptoms, not causes

    High CPU may be fine. Checkout failing is never fine. Alert on the second and use the first to explain it.

  3. 03

    Give every alert an owner and a runbook

    An alert with no named owner and no first step is a notification, not an alert.

  4. 04

    Make logs and traces correlatable

    Enough context to follow one request across services, so diagnosis is reading rather than guessing.

  5. 05

    Tune ruthlessly

    Every alert that fires without needing action gets fixed or deleted. Noise is the thing that kills monitoring.

  6. 06

    Rehearse

    Test that the alert path actually reaches a human, including at 3am on a weekend. Most on-call gaps are discovered during a real incident.

What we will not do

The refusals

  • Add dashboards nobody looks at and call it observability.
  • Alert on every metric available because the tool makes it easy.
  • Report uptime from a check that only proves the homepage loads.
  • Set up on-call without agreeing who is actually on it.

Questions

Before you ask

The transaction that makes you money, end to end, as a customer experiences it. If orders can be placed and reach fulfilment, most other problems are degradations rather than outages. Start there and expand, rather than instrumenting everything and drowning.
If anyone has ever ignored one because it is "probably nothing", you are already past the limit. A healthy setup produces few alerts and every one means something. Getting there means deleting monitors, which teams find harder than adding them.
Whatever fits the stack and the budget — Grafana, Prometheus, Datadog, New Relic, or the cloud provider's own. Tool choice matters far less than whether the alerts are meaningful and somebody is genuinely on the other end.
It only works if it is explicit: who is on, how they are reached, what they are expected to do, and what happens when they cannot. Informal on-call — where everyone assumes the same person will notice — fails exactly when it is needed.

Tell us what isn't working.

One process, one system, one decision you are stuck on. We will come back with how we would approach it, what it would take, and whether it needs building at all.

The Stratgik model

Strategy first. Technology that follows through.

Four stages, in order. Most businesses need them one at a time.