Least-privilege access
Each integration gets the narrowest scope that lets the work function. Nothing more.
Stratgik — technology strategy and business systems engineering.
Delivery across the USA, UK, UAE and India.
Stage 02 · BuildCRM & ERP systems
CRM and ERP are where a company keeps its truth. When the software cannot express how you actually work, people build a shadow process in spreadsheets and the truth moves out of the system.
In short
Most CRM and ERP problems are configuration and process problems rather than software problems. Before customizing or replacing, the questions are whether the workflow in the system matches the workflow in the business, whether the data is clean enough to trust, and whether the people entering it get anything back. Replacing a platform without answering those reproduces the same situation on a newer licence.
Self-audit
Tick the ones that are true where you are. Nothing is sent anywhere — the answer is for you, not for us.
If more than one of these is true today, the problem is usually further along than it looks from the outside. That is not a sales line; it is what the cost of waiting does.
0 of 5 true
Nothing ticked yet.
How we do it
Each step ships something you keep. You can stop after any of them and still be better off than when you started.
Start with step oneStep 1 of 6
Sit with the people doing it. The documented process and the real one differ, and the difference is where the project succeeds or fails.
Step 2 of 6
A large share of "we need custom development" is a module bought and never set up. Configuration is cheaper to own and survives upgrades.
Step 3 of 6
Duplicate customers and inconsistent product codes undermine everything downstream. This is scoped as real work, not a migration footnote.
Step 4 of 6
Where the business genuinely differs, extend rather than fork, so upgrades stay possible.
Step 5 of 6
One authoritative source per fact, with the others reading from it.
Step 6 of 6
People maintain data they get value from. If the system only takes, the data decays whatever the policy says.
Assurance
These controls apply to every engagement, including this one. They are engineering decisions, not a certificate on a wall — and you can check each of them.
Each integration gets the narrowest scope that lets the work function. Nothing more.
Accounts and keys live in your tenancy. You can revoke any of them without asking us.
Changes, deployments and incidents leave a written trail you can audit.
A backup only counts once it has been restored. We test, and we report the result.
Development never touches production credentials or unmasked customer data.
Runbooks written as we go. Leaving means revoking our access — nothing is held back.
What we will not do
The things we turn down are a better description of how we work than the things we sell.
We will not: Replace a platform before establishing whether it was ever configured properly.
We will not: Customize around a process that should be simplified instead.
We will not: Migrate dirty data on the assumption it will be cleaned later.
We will not: Promise an upgrade path while forking core behaviour.
Questions
Anything else, ask on the first call. There is no charge for working out whether this is the right fit.
Talk about a problemFix it first, in most cases. Replacement is justified when the platform genuinely cannot express your model, when it is unsupported, or when the licence economics have stopped working. It is not justified because the current one is disliked — that is usually configuration, training and data quality, all of which follow you to the new system.
Data cleanup is scoped as its own piece of work with its own estimate, because it is where migrations overrun. We migrate in stages with both systems readable, reconcile record counts and key totals, and keep the old system available read-only until the new one has been trusted through a full business cycle.
Yes. Most of this work is on Salesforce, HubSpot, Dynamics, Zoho, SAP, NetSuite, Odoo and similar, plus the custom systems that grew alongside them. The platform matters less than whether it is configured to match how the business actually runs.
They are evidence, not misbehaviour. Every one is a place the system failed to support real work. We read them before designing anything, because they describe the requirements more honestly than any specification.
One process, one system, one decision you are stuck on. An engineer replies within one working day with how we would approach it, and whether it needs building at all.
The Stratgik model
Four stages, in order. Most businesses need them one at a time.