Skip to content

Stratgik — technology strategy and business systems engineering.
Delivery across the USA, UK, UAE and India.

Talk about a problem

Backup & recovery

A backup you have not restored is a hope

Backup jobs report success for years and then fail the one time it matters — the wrong data, an unusable format, or an encryption key nobody kept.

In short

Backup is the copy; recovery is the capability, and only one of them matters. The two numbers that define it are RPO — how much data you can afford to lose, which sets backup frequency — and RTO — how long you can afford to be down, which sets how recovery is architected. Neither is a technical decision; both are business decisions about acceptable loss. A backup that has never been restored into a working system should be treated as untested, because in practice that is what it is.

When it applies

Signals this is the work

If more than one of these is true today, the problem is usually further along than it looks from the outside.

Restores have never been tested

The job is green. Nobody has proved it produces a working system.

Nobody can state RPO or RTO

There is no agreed answer to how much data may be lost or how long recovery may take.

Backups sit beside the thing they protect

Same account, same region, same credentials. A compromise that reaches one reaches both.

Only the database is covered

Configuration, secrets, uploaded files and infrastructure definitions are not, so a restore produces a database and no system.

Ransomware would reach the backups

Nothing is immutable or offline, so encrypted production means encrypted backups.

How we do it

The sequence

  1. 01

    Set RPO and RTO with the business

    Ask what an hour of lost data costs and what a day of downtime costs. The architecture follows from the answers rather than preceding them.

  2. 02

    Back up the whole system

    Data, configuration, secrets, files and the infrastructure definition. A restore has to produce something that runs.

  3. 03

    Separate and make immutable

    Different account, different region, write-once retention. Backups must survive the event that destroys production.

  4. 04

    Restore on a schedule

    Into a real environment, timed against the RTO. This is the only evidence that any of it works.

  5. 05

    Write the runbook

    Step by step, followable by someone who did not design it, under pressure, possibly at night.

  6. 06

    Rehearse the whole failure

    Not just the database restore — the full path including DNS, certificates, integrations and the decision to declare an incident.

What we will not do

The refusals

  • Report backup success without a restore test behind it.
  • Set an RTO the architecture cannot meet, because it sounds reassuring.
  • Store backups where the same compromise reaches both copies.
  • Write a recovery plan nobody has ever executed.

Questions

Before you ask

Quarterly for most businesses, monthly where data loss would be severe, and always after any significant architectural change. The test has to be a real restore into a working environment and timed — a restore that succeeds but takes eleven hours against a four-hour RTO has told you something important.
Backup protects data. Disaster recovery restores the service — compute, network, DNS, certificates, integrations and the people doing it. Many organizations have solid backups and no recovery capability, and only discover the gap during the incident.
Immutable backups with write-once retention, in a separate account with separate credentials, plus enough retention depth that you can go back past the point of compromise. Modern ransomware targets backups deliberately, so the ability to reach and delete them is the vulnerability that matters.
It scales with how fast you need it. Restoring within a day from routine backups is inexpensive. Sub-hour recovery means warm standby infrastructure and costs considerably more. The right spend is whatever downtime actually costs you — which is why the RPO and RTO conversation comes first.

Tell us what isn't working.

One process, one system, one decision you are stuck on. We will come back with how we would approach it, what it would take, and whether it needs building at all.

The Stratgik model

Strategy first. Technology that follows through.

Four stages, in order. Most businesses need them one at a time.