How accurate is AI churn prediction?
AI churn prediction accuracy depends on your data, so we measure it on your own history before going live. In the pilot we backtest on 12–24 months of cancellations and report precision in the top-risk group: of the accounts flagged, how many actually churned. Calibrated scores let your team read a score of 80 as roughly an 8-in-10 historical chance at that level.
What data do you need to predict customer churn?
You need at least a customer list with start and cancel dates, plus some behaviour data. The strongest signals usually come from product usage, payment failures, support tickets and contract dates. We connect read-only to tools like Stripe, Chargebee, Salesforce, HubSpot, Zendesk and your data warehouse. Twelve months of history with a few hundred churn events is a practical minimum.
How far in advance can AI predict churn?
Most businesses get useful warning 60 to 90 days ahead. Monthly consumer subscriptions such as fitness often suit a 30–60 day window, while annual B2B contracts suit 90 days before renewal. We test several windows in the backtest and pick the one where the model is accurate enough and your team still has time to run a save-play.
How much does a churn prediction model cost?
A Stratgik churn prediction pilot costs $14,000 for 21 days, covering backtest, live scoring and CRM save-plays for one segment. Production runs at $3,500 a month including retraining and reporting. Cloud and model usage is billed at cost. Compare that with the revenue from the handful of accounts the model helps you keep each quarter.
Is a churn model better than a customer health score?
A trained churn model is usually more reliable than a hand-built health score because its weights come from your real cancellations, not opinion. Health scores are fine for small books of business. Once you have hundreds of accounts and data in several tools, a model catches combinations of signals, such as falling usage plus an open ticket, that manual scores miss.
How do you prove AI churn prediction actually saved revenue?
We hold back a random control group of high-risk accounts that receive no save-play. After the window closes we compare churn in the treated group against the control. The difference, multiplied by revenue per account, is the retained revenue. This is the one metric we agree before the pilot starts, so the result is not open to interpretation.